Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Conant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Conant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:BASIC and WP:NACTOR. Article is completely unsourced and fails WP:V. A WP:BEFORE search failed to yield anything that even remotely comes close to ringing the WP:N bell. The first five pages off the Google search yielded trivial mentions from non RS sources only. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:10, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:21, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:23, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While playbill.com credits him for Finishing Touches [1] I think the most in-depth article about him is his wedding announcement [2]. Even the NYT review of the play mentions him in passing amongst other cast members [3] as "young people". Seems to be just trivial mentioning. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:31, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to fail inclusion criteria and an actor who does not meet the WP:NACOR requirements for an article on Wikipedia. as I'm not seeing significant coverage in independent reliable sources to support this article in Wikipedia mainspace. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.