Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar al serhan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 19:58, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Omar al serhan
- Omar al serhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:PROF jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 09:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- I hesitated jumping in, because if I am being honest w/ myself, Marketing science is a field I may be biased against and can't trust my judgment to be neutral about it in general. But he's a 2016 Ph.D. w/o a record of major publication, which is almost always almost a decade WP:TOOSOON for any field. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 18:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The article presents no claim of notability which in any case as Mscuthbert has already stated is unlikely at this stage of his career. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.