Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One/Off Printmakers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. qedk (t 愛 c) 07:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One/Off Printmakers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a local printmaker's association. After removing many event announcements used as RS, it's clear that this is an NCORP fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Notability is not inherited from artists who have worked there or their affiliations. The sourcing amounts to listings and press releases. Fails WP:NCORP. Netherzone (talk) 20:31, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.