Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One More Light Tour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. At this point the article now includes a number of secondary sources. I think it's beyond the scope of my duty here to evaluate the reliability of these sources, but the has article has been relisted twice now and I don't think the level of discussion warrants an extraordinary third relist. A Train^talk 17:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

One More Light Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AFAIK, after a brief google search, I have determined that the entire tour is not covered in multiple independent reliable sources. Template {{2p}} was placed at the top of the page twice, but was also twice removed. As of now, there are still no sources outside of "linkinpark.com" in the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- At least for now. If the tour goes ahead and is verified by external sources, I see no issue in the article being amended and launched again. Clawsyclaw (talk) 08:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- Let me expand the article and add external reliable sources to the article. NotNITINChopra · ^{[ Poke ]} 10:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - @NotNitinChopra:, thank you for your efforts. I am also willing to entertain a merge if the community agrees. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I found a number of sources: [1] [2] [3]. The table would look unwieldy if merged into the album article. feminist 11:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - @Feminist:, the three sources are not in depth, nor are they currently in the article. Again, I will support a merge in order to keep the history in tact, but we have got to have better independent referencing. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:52, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Note to closing administrator - As of April 29, 2017, there are still no in-depth secondary nor tertiary sources in the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's not up to you to decide, right? feminist 11:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - @Feminist:, exactly! --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete A few articles announcing an upcoming tour are routine coverage and not notable IMO. The existence of sources are what determines notability, not the condition and sources in the current article. From what I've seen so far the subject fails WP:NTOUR. Gab4gab (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I am currently in the process of gathering information to expand the article and correct its known issues. I estimate I should have this completed by 11 May 2017. 50.155.157.164 (talk) 07:41, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep - Please review the article, I've expanded it adding a few sources to it. NotNITINChopra · ^{[ Poke ]} 03:38, 9 May 2017 (UTC)— Duplicate vote: NotNitinChopra (talk • contribs) has already cast a vote above.[reply]

• Merge; as discussed above the sources presented are insubstantial routine coverage sort of stuff. Definitely worth keeping this information, but in the album article where it belongs. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.