Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oneal Sandidge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 04:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oneal Sandidge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly just the flags that have been sitting here for a few months now.

The writing is also strange. For instance: "Sandidge developed strong writing skills under the guidance of Dr. James Campbell." Sorry but, huh? If he wrote that, which he probably did, his writing skills are not strong.

Other stuff about completely indeterminate "inspiration" also fails to rise to the level of encyclopedic relevance; it reads, instead, like a prose resume. Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Christianity, Arkansas, New York, and Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems to have no chance of meeting WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Not seeing any significant citations in GS. Espresso Addict (talk) 20:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails to meet WP:BIO, no significant coverage. Mooonswimmer 14:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, doesn't meet GNG nor NPROF. --Mvqr (talk) 14:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.