Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oneupweb (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oneupweb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

2010 article about a digital marketing agency created by a near-SPA and with no real indication of notability. Some run of the mill sector awards. Does not pass WP:NCORP. Mccapra (talk) 15:44, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 15:44, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 15:44, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 15:44, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Still as non-notable as it was during the 2007 AfD. SL93 (talk) 23:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORGDEPTH, current citations are incredibly old and mostly consist of routine coverage and the article hasn't been improved in many years. Prolix 💬 16:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Agree with above comments. Many citations are very old and I don't see any major media. I have seen marketing companies more notable than this being deleted. Expertwikiguy (talk) 23:59, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The company's activities since the 2007 AfD may merit reconsideration of this WP:SPA instance created and curated since 2010, but the article does no more than describe a company going about its business, with no indication of encyclopaedic notability, supported by coverage of awards and routine announcements which fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. My searches are not finding evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 15:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.