Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Only Revolutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure).Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:48, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. According to WP:NBOOK, the book must win the award, as opposed to being a finalist 1292simon (talk) 03:52, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm more than a little concerned that the article is completely unsourced but has so much content that looks like it essentially boils down to WP:OR. If the article is kept, we'll probably have to gut it in order to remove all of the unsourced content. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:33, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The original format of the article was awful, at least from a Wikipedia standpoint, as almost the entire article was written as original research and was completely unsourced. If it was a fan website or fan wiki, it'd be great but not so much for a Wikipedia article where we have to have every theory, opinion, and interpretation backed up with some sort of coverage in reliable sources. (IE, a fan interpretation is just that- a fan's intepretation. If it was say, something pulled from a scholarly article, then we could potentially use that.) That said, the article still gained quite a bit of coverage in reliable sources by way of reviews and whatnot, so it passes notability guidelines on that front. On a side note, it's interesting to see how extremely divided the reviews are as this really is the "you'll like it or not" type of read. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:52, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As above. J 1982 (talk) 16:39, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

note to closing admin J 1982 (talk · contribs) has made a spree of 23 identical keep as above !votes in 29 minutes. LibStar (talk) 12:23, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note to admin - if this AfD should be closed due to the improvements made to the article (thanks Tokyogirl179!), that's fine by me. 1292simon (talk) 02:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.