Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Mobile Ticketing Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Open Mobile Ticketing Alliance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Significance Ueutyi (talk) 00:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just wondering if I can get some further detail on why this is being discussed for deletion - significance is quite an ambiguous critique, may I ask what the requirements are?

I am currently studying future payment solutions and associated technology, I found this initiative interesting - France have recently established a similar alliance of their own: http://www.railjournal.com/index.php/technology/french-contactless-ticketing-alliance-formed.html

Best wishes, Enochian88 (talk) 01:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and draft and userfy if needed as there's hardly even much for a better acceptable article not to mention fully satisfying the applicable notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 08:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a parent link, OMTA is already mentioned in the HERE company article.Enochian88 (talk) 22:20, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:02, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:46, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and potentially use this information to expand mobile ticketing. I looked for notability and do not yet see sufficient reporting of this subject to pass WP:GNG. I compared media coverage on this subject to Masabi (company), which is a similar effort and shows much more media coverage. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 06:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to meet notability criteria. Virtually all of the information I found was either pr, churnalism, or brief mentions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.