Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opening the High Frontier: Our Future in Space

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:57, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opening the High Frontier: Our Future in Space

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of coverage in independent reliable sources found via Google (only 15 hits total for a search on the title). The review linked from the article is on one person's personal website. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK. Largoplazo (talk) 17:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to be independently reviewed at least twice. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where? I see only the one review on a personal website. Largoplazo (talk) 03:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Inadequate notability. Personal essay. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep As the person who created the article I am unsure if it is appropriate for me to vote. If it is, this is my vote. Also, please note I have added another link to a second book review on this book in the external links. I have also been informed by someone I know at the National Space Society that they are also working on a book review for this book. I will add a link to this new review as soon as it comes out on the NSS website. Jonah and the Whale (talk) 20:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly is appropriate and it's recommended people identify themselves when they are the article creator, which you have done. Thanks. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:28, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:BK Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 01:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails notoriety at the simplest of WP standards. Cllgbksr (talk) 06:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I still have a copy of The High Frontier: Human Colonies in Space, but this follow-up doesn't have a claim of notability. Alansohn (talk) 02:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails WP:NBOOK. Cited reviews are a personal web site and a blog. — JFG ^talk 12:11, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.