Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opinion polling for the next Japanese general election

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Next Japanese general election. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polling for the next Japanese general election (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I genuinely don't know what the point of this page is. We don't really need opinion polls for an election that has already taken place, and the next Japanese general election isn't for another four years (making "opinions" rather useless). The only links on the page are dead, to boot. Primefac (talk) 13:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see a reason why a separate article has to exist now before opinion polls have been released, or for that matter, before even a substantial amount been published – why not simply include them in the existing article (Next Japanese general election) until there are enough to warrant a size split after a few months? It shouldn't take long to set up the tables again when needed. Mélencron (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fine with that. Pinging Imaginatorium as the lone delete holdout. Primefac (talk) 17:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I just commented that this does not seem a useful "article"; redirects are cheap. Imaginatorium (talk) 17:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh sorry. yes, I assumed Imaginatorium would have no objection to a redirect. I'll do so. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:44, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opinion polling for the next Japanese general election, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.