Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opportunity engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 23:09, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Opportunity engineering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged as dictdef since 2011, stub, tagged for cleanup since 2009, unreferenced, and poorly written to the point I'm not sure what it is trying to say. RJFJR (talk) 17:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 18:55, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Non-notable neologism per WP:NEO. I've found a few mentions of the term in GBOOKS, but they don't appear to agree on what it means. The single run-on sentence dicdef reads like a PowerPoint nightmare from a marketing consultant, but for the life of me I can't think how it can be improved. The Mighty Glen (talk) 19:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.