Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OptiBiotix Health

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 02:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OptiBiotix Health

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NCORP and WP:PROMO. Article doesn't prove any notability outside the product/research they create and the fact that they showed some posters at an expo one time. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 19:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree it seems to fail our notability guidlines, and having ® in text does suggest that this was written with promotional intent in mind. WP:CORPSPAM. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:19, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It's just a little short of G11. Cabayi (talk) 09:07, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Promotional. I could find no mention of this company in reliable independent sources so fails WP:ORGSIG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.