Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optismo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Optismo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable and promotional. Essentially all the refs are to its own site. DGG ( talk ) 20:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as there's not even much as it is but there's also nothing to suggest better. Pinging tagger Josu4u. SwisterTwister talk 20:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• SwisterTwister I requested Optismo for Wikipedia:G11, but Appable removed my speedy deletion tag and commented 'Reverted 1 edit by Josu4u (talk): Move to WP:PROD or WP:AFD, do not recreate declined WP:CSDs.'Josu4u (talk) 20:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Improved: Nickinglis addressed the issue of references to own site by adding two additional external references, one from the IG Initiative which is the leading thinktank with regards to Information Governance and one from Iron Mountain, one of the largest companies in the industry referencing one of Optismo's Open Source models. I'm looking to make this article as useful as possible for Wikipedia visitors and there are similar companies (competitors) in the space have all been granted entries. Optismo has had noteworthy creations, The Information Governance Conference, The Information Governance Model, etc. which make it more noteworthy than similar companies and deserving of its' entry in Wikipedia.

• Delete The references added were mainly to a conference that the company participated in, in its product area. Another reference is from the Iron Mountain company web site, where they promote "solutions." Cite #2 didn't mention the company. This means that there are still no third-party sources. LaMona (talk) 04:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - non-notable, run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM by editor with undeclared conflict of interest. Undisclosed paid editing is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not. The promotional tone of the article reflects its intended role as an advertisement. Citobun (talk) 09:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as per nom and above editors. Searches did not turn up anything to show they pass either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. LaMona's assessment of the new sources in the article is spot on. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.