Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PCSO-524 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ben · Salvidrim!  16:41, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PCSO-524

PCSO-524 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously kept on the basis of a scientific study, but this turns out to be in a predatory open access journal. The remaining sources are a patent and a reference to a truth-in-advertising case, following which the manufacturer discontinued some claims. Google shows mainly press releases and uncontrolled trials. I am not seeing any evidence this product is notable. It was created by a WP:SPA and has not really been touched since. Guy (Help!) 12:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 13:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 13:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PCSO-524 (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.