Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PIQC Institute of Quality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PIQC Institute of Quality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Might be an advertisement. No coverage in my searches. Seems to fails WP:GNG. See User talk:PIQC Pakistan. Störm (talk) 17:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 18:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 18:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 18:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:35, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no 3rd party sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I did a Google search for independent coverage of the PIQC Institute of Quality and did not find anything that satisfies the general notability guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia. Malinaccier (talk) 02:38, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.