Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PIXY Android Smart Car

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PIXY Android Smart Car

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to have met WP:PRODUCT and little to no significant coverage from multiple reliable sources, fails GNG—UY Scuti ^Talk 16:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – per source searches, does not meet WP:GNG. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Long-term WP:CONSENSUS is that distinct make-and-models of vehicles are always notable, which - amazingly, given the state of the article - this does in fact appear to be. Buuuut there is no news, no releases, just the company's Facebook page and a Youtube video. Now ordinarly based on the long-term standard I would have said keep, but my inner Admiral Ackbar is crying out that "It's A Hoax!" So, those of our editors with more ears on the ground out India way: is this fire, or just blown smoke? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (without prejudice) - Material must be verifiable and there are no sources available to do so. ~Kvng (talk) 15:18, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.