Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POPxo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

POPxo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources totally fail in WP:DEPTH. Another article created by indef blocked editor user:BiH, many of whose paid creations have been deleted or are currently under AfD. The sources totally fail in WP:DEPTH.; no other reliable, independent sources found. Small, start-up web based operation, with only 13 employees, without better sources it fails notability per WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. IT exists, but the sources don't seem to pass muster for combined independence, in-depth coverage or reliability. If anyone wants to argue otherwise, please say which sources pass. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:59, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NCORP As another editor said in a related AfD. A promotional article by a paid editor is an advertisement. Advertisements are not appropriate for Wikipedia and should be deleted. Jbh ^Talk 03:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It's pretty uncomfortable how much this article looks like an advertisement. As stated above, the company has gotten a bit of attention from the news media, but it seems to pretty much fail to pass the bar in terms of notability. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 12:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 12:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 12:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yes, this came up earlier in the list of COI articles by BiH, and it does indeed fail wp:corp, being a company of no particular note, as per the references here -- and I do not find any others that would change my !vote. LaMona (talk) 15:48, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now (draft and userfy if needed) as although News and browser found results, there's nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.