Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POTD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Wiktionary redirect. Clear consensus not to retain a Wikipedia article. Softly redirecting to Wiktionary ensures that readers still find the definition in the appropriate place. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POTD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable at all. Noah ^💬 16:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Noah ^💬 16:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary, tagged for notability since 2012. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. What LaundryPizza03 said. -- Hoary (talk) 12:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Soft redirect to Wiktionary. Clearly a term in use, but there is no encyclopedic content here, just a dictionary definition. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.