Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSA Tour (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PSA Tour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NTOUR, the tour only grossed $1,294,000.00 for their entire tour of 6 shows + 4 cancellations VS 11 other groups whose single performance surpassed the PSA Tour's 6 show total. The list of future dates is noncompliant with WP:BALL ^{Atsme📞📧} 00:20, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This nomination was actually proposed by User:Atsme at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSA Tour. I am just fixing the nom. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's too early to decide whether PSA Tour should be deleted. In fact, the article doesn't deserve deletion anyway! 72.92.40.158 (talk) 10:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear anon, you are welcome to express your opinion, but if you do so, you should not close the deletion discussion per WP:INVOLVED. In particular, you should definitely not close it before it has run its 7 days unless it is a speedy keep case, and certainly not with a summary "withdrawn nomination", which can only be done by the person who nominated the article for deletion. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  14:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete purely WP:PROMO for a tour of imho non notable girls who have an article already. This article doesn't even belong at the girls article, but on their website. How have I found myself in agreement with Atsme? -Roxy the dog. bark 18:39, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The answer. ^{Atsme📞📧} 20:23, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as promo. Possibly merge the most relevant content into Fifth Harmony if it isn't there already. Montanabw^(talk) 21:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete from main space. At best TOOSOON and poor PROMO. Perhaps move to draft space and resurect after the event and it has some possible notability and details to be filled in. Aoziwe (talk) 10:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.