Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paco Lala's (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paco Lala's

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Tagged for additional sources in 2011, but no improvements were made. Could also be redirected to Cada mañana where the subject is mentioned, though I personally prefer deletion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Television, and Mexico. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. Fails WP:ENT and the one source only makes a passing mention as a picture-caption and doesn't demonstrate notability. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment found a couple of articles ([1], [2]) about some legal troubles he has been having; not sure if that is enough to establish notability. I also don't know anything about the reliability of that second publication (Univision I presume is reliable). WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I checked these sources, and while it talks about the problems he was facing, from my point of view this does not establish notability as an entertainer/TV personality. While Univision I'd agree seems to be a reliable source on its own right, it talks mainly about the scandal and not about Paco Lala's career. Neither of those two links back up Paco Lalas' notability, nor can I find reliable sources that do, so the background of "panelist on one show" does not seem to be enough. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails GNG, tagged for sources for too long; clearly cannot be considered as a notable. Ekdalian (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.