Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palwasha Bashir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) - TheMagnificentist 12:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Palwasha Bashir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable badminton player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:03, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as she is a winner of the tournament so she passes WP:NBADMINTON. @Mar4d: User has nominated around 12 similar articles in less than a minute. Greenbörg (talk) 05:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Greenbörg. Mar4d (talk) 09:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• There is absolutely no GNG at all so this person is not-notable at all. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable badminton player, meet GNG, NBADMINTON. [1] [2] [3] [4]. It seems that Sportsfan 1234 are too hasty to judge an articles without woking on it.Stvbastian (talk) 02:22, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable badminton player, meets GNG per WP:NBADMINTON. Florentyna (talk) 16:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep And consider taking nominator to WP:ANI for indiscriminately nominating ~50 badminton articles for deletion in the span of about half an hour. Close them all as keep rather than overwhelm voters with 50 identical nominations. If anyone has any specific concerns, they can nominate specific articles. Smartyllama (talk) 15:26, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.