Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradoxical Sajid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:38, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paradoxical Sajid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This book does not appear to meet relevant notability guideline WP:NBOOK. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. the ISBN code is not working for me either, Saqib (talk) 18:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. no reliable independent sources found. - Mar11 (talk) 03:19, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom.Deb (talk) 10:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --আফতাব (talk) 21:20, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I can't find any reliable sources either: there's Facebook, and there's Wikipedia. I strongly doubts this complies with WP:NBOOK. I don't understand note 3, which is supposed to source the claim that the book "became bestseller", and which states, in full: "Double Standard. Bangladesh: Maktabatul Azhar. 2017. p. 5." If the book is really a bestseller, I would have expected that fact to be sourceable to a reliable source somewhere on the internet. The publisher, Guardian Publications, smells like a vanity press to me, but I admit I can't read their website, [1]. Could a Bengali speaker help? Bishonen | talk 16:52, 12 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.