Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parthiv Shah (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Parthiv Shah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO Fiddle Faddle 11:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We can clean it up and keep it.Agrawal.akshay98 (talk) 11:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out the article may well be worth keeping if only someone were to add enough inline citations.Agrawal.akshay98 (talk) 12:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 19:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 19:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not yet fully satisfying the applicable notability guidelines, draft and userfy if needed. SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable. Curro2 (talk) 03:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:31, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:31, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO and his organisation which he founded Centre for Media and Alternative Communication does not have a corresponding article WP:WTAF and fails WP:SIGCOV.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.