Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia M. McCarthy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:53, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia M. McCarthy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed judicial nominee that lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to pass WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 14:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Law, and Massachusetts. Let'srun (talk) 14:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for failing WP:GNG as article creator. Safiel (talk) 15:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG - judicial nominees are not necessarily notable. SportingFlyer T·C 19:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: All sources listed are either namedrops or primary. No evidence the subject passes the GNG beyond routine coverage. Ravenswing 00:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. No notability shown. Failes WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 05:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom , fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.