Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Norton (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:27, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Norton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG/WP:BIO. Previous nomination ended in keep essentially because multiple users said WP:ILIKEIT and assumed that Norton WP:INHERITS notability from the projects he has worked on. I was unable to find independent and reliable secondary sources. There does not appear to be a clear redirect target. TipsyElephant (talk) 12:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rogermx (talk) 15:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:39, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Norton (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.