Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Rohr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Cielquiparle (talk) 13:38, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rohr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While accomplished, I cannot find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, and Switzerland. Shellwood (talk) 13:37, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I went through the first four pages of googlehits and there is probably something to work with [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Geschichte (talk) 15:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, Rohr is, as the nom said, accomplished, and the reliable sources available from a google search are enough to pass GNG. I agree with Geschicte and support a Keep of this article with a possible nudge to continue work on it.Iljhgtn (talk) 15:33, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Sources in the comment above seem ok, enough to confirm notability. They're in German but easy enough to translate. Oaktree b (talk) 18:06, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The article now includes coverage from multiple sources covering 15+ years: Tages-Anzeiger (×3), Aargauer Zeitung, SRF, and Schweizer Illustrierte (all WP:RS). The subject’s work as a TV presenter, journalist, photographer, and communications consultant is covered in sufficient depth to meet WP:GNG. HerBauhaus (talk) 14:49, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.