Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulo Quevedo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paulo Quevedo

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:NACTOR. Although multiple roles in TV series are mentioned, no references are provided, which makes verifying them difficult, and none of them seems to be significant. Couldn't find any sources on the web besides celebrity sites and content copied from Wikipedia. None of the 7 other wikis mention any sources whatsoever. PRmaster1 (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Mexico. PRmaster1 (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No news coverage on Google News — only a blog shows up. Even if the blog was reliable, Quevedo is only mentioned in passing. On Search I see his IMDb page and Rotten Tomatoes. IMDb usually isn't a reliable source, and Rotten Tomatoes won't really help us improve this article. Besides that I see many unreliable celebrity websites. With the sources I could find, he does not pass the general notability guidelines, or the general BLP notability guidelines, or the actor notability guidelines. Capsulecap ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I'm afraid I have only found brief mentions, blogs, user-generated content, and celebrity sites without byline, too. Suitskvarts (talk) 08:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.