Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peer-to-Peer Electronic Accounting System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is clear consensus to delete this article at this time. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 07:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peer-to-Peer Electronic Accounting System

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism per WP:NEO and WP:No original research. I can find little to no substantial mention of the subject online, apart from research papers apparently written by the article creator. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} 06:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This topic is the article creator’s stated area of research. Outside of that it doesn’t seem to get a mention, so not notable. Mccapra (talk) 08:06, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Flapjacktastic (talk) 08:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet -related deletion discussions. Flapjacktastic (talk) 08:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software -related deletion discussions. Flapjacktastic (talk) 08:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. I prodded it on similar grounds, and the prod was contested without comment by an anonymous editor, who also added some references to the previously unsourced article. Two mention peer-to-peer transactions but not this subject, one is a subscriber-only JSTOR link, and two are research papers by the article creator. I can find nothing about it online in RS outside of research proposals by a single researcher. Flapjacktastic (talk) 08:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Don't see which part cannot be covered on main articles of the subject. Shashank5988 (talk) 21:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.