Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peg Rawes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:24, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peg Rawes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not meet notability requirements Nquinn91 (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article has been here for 5 years with no sources. Rawes has 2 books with very average holdings, GS h-index of 5, etc. All-in-all, seems very much to be "the average professor". Agricola44 (talk) 21:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - websearches turn up nothing, has published two books, themselves of unclear notability, my Google search says that the first was cited 17 times, the second 10 times, whatever that should mean, but I doubt that the subject could pass WP:SCHOLAR. Kraxler (talk) 14:25, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Found a mention here, but my search of British media, plus architectural magazines, did not turn up much.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:27, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.