Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peng Lifa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peng Lifa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I haven't seen this person get any independent notability other than 2022 Beijing Sitong Bridge protest Coddlebean (talk) 02:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politics, and China. Coddlebean (talk) 02:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll have to present sources as raw urls for now, lest I make myself late for work again. Will try to fix during the course of the day.
    First off, Coddlebean, thanks for providing an actual deletion rationale this time. I don't think WP:BIO1E / WP:BLP1E applies here though: the criteria for the initial notability are not met, and the subject's status as a political prisoner still two years thence has generated continuing notability, per these unannotated sources:
    Not that we require better sources for the subject's initial notability from the lockdown protests, but there are book and journal sources: isbn 9798330208418,doi:10.1017/S1054204324000054 Open access icon,doi:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000864, Xu 2024,doi:10.3390/philosophies9040118, Thireau 2023, Menegazzi 2022 pp. 2–3.
    Apologies for the garbage formatting: already late for work just from the source searches and copypasta. Keep. Folly Mox (talk) 13:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the current sources are good enough to grant GNG. New sources pointed out in the comment above are good too wigh significant coverage. --NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 13:14, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per NiftyyyNofteeeee. - Amigao (talk) 01:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
    Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peng Lifa, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.