Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pepsi Pass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. In the absence of any sources, "delete" is the only possible outcome. Randykitty (talk) 16:11, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pepsi Pass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPRODUCT. No coverage in WP:RS beyond passing mentions. – Teratix ₵ 23:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 23:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 23:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Pepsi Stuff has its own article with plenty of sources, and has since been replaced by Pepsi Pass. Large companies' loyalty programs are notable, see Template:Customer loyalty programs. — Stevey7788 (talk) 00:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Stevey7788: The existence of other articles on large company loyalty programs does not imply every large company's loyalty program is notable (WP:OSE), and the existence of a template does not change this. The sourcing for Pepsi Stuff is slimmer than it looks; the only independent source that is not deadlinked is a brief mention in The New York Times. Even if the sourcing for Pepsi Stuff was top-notch, this would not imply anything about the merits of Pepsi Pass's sources. – Teratix ₵ 01:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:NPRODUCT --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.