Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Per Capita

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 15:41, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per Capita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article reads like an advertisement or promotion. Makes loads of unsubstantiated claims which aren’t backed up by third-party sources.

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agree with originally stated reasons. Seems to have been created by an individual who could be assumed to have some ties to the group (admittedly, back in 2006), and the organization does not seem to have significant coverage in any sense past that point. While some citations are present, they seem to be so passing as to not confer notability (ie. other orgnizations presenting information that 'aligns with Per Capita research' or is 'likely influenced by Per Capita findings'). A MINOTAUR (talk) 15:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Potential WP:PROMO. Most of the sources are primary. LibStar (talk) 12:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.