Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PerdutaMente

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 17:16, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PerdutaMente

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New article that fails Google test. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 21:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Disability, and Italy. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 21:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. "Failing Google test"??? Perhaps try changing your navigator settings then... Article improved (with some sources) since this discussion started. And indeed many sources exist (including, it's true, various interviews with the director but I assume it is because it's a documentary dealing with a rather particular topic; but one, which is on the page, is in La Repubblica). Anyway, a brief Google search gives (and these are not interviews): this in La Stampa, and this, and this and this and this...— MY, OH, MY! 09:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mushy Yank Unfortunately, I don't know how to change my "navigator settings." I'm not even sure if they exist. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 17:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@I dream of horses They do exist (but maybe you were joking, in which case, sorry because I am afraid I was deadly serious). Maybe the fact that sources did not show up on the first page (?) of your search was only a matter of typing +"film" in the automated search ’Perdutamente’ "-wikipedia", because the title alone of this film is obviously also a common adverb in Italian. But, anyway, now that you do have a few sources attesting the notability of this film that are presented to you, would you consider withdrawing your deletion proposal? .— MY, OH, MY! 19:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mushy Yank I'm not joking. I just misunderstood your term of "navigator settings." Since there's no harm done in having someone else fluent in Italian to evaluate those sources you added, I'm not withdrawing the nomination. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 19:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thank you for your replies. Just for the record, I did not add anything on the page, that was someone else, the page creator, I think; I only presented the links to 5-6 sources here. But maybe that was clear. Best,.— MY, OH, MY! 19:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added a La Stampa reference to the article. The Sky references are not actually independent. There are undoubtedly other Italian sources but so many are behind paywalls. Lamona (talk) 03:53, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 12:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Failing the Google test isn’t a valid reason to delete an article. What matters is the content in the article, the sources cited, and not that the nominator can’t find much about it on Google. I would like to hear more compelling arguments to delete. Lamona also makes a strong argument above. -🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 13:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Illusion Flame You're right in thatFailing the Google test isn’t a valid reason to delete an article; it is a reason to nominate it for deletion. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 20:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.