Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pericent Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete G11, A7, take your pick. Courcelles (talk) 09:55, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pericent Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional and fails WP:NCORP. There are no reliable sources that cover the topic in detail. MT Train^Discuss 05:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I had last month got the original article Pericent deleted on A7, G11, G12 criteria. The current article was created by a probably paid/coi editor related to the company, which I concluded per this edit of theirs, where they write "we will capture 0.09% of the overall market share in next five years which is USD 11 million". The article is a promotional puff piece. The sources that are available are unreliable and seem like PR websites. The company fails to clear our GNG and ORG thresholds. Lourdes 06:32, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Previously twice speedy-deleted as Pericent and rejected twice at AfC but now appearing in article space again. The references are weak: leaving aside the listing and press releases, there are the Silicon India Enterprise Services and InsightsSuccess items, perhaps sufficient to verify the basics of a company going about its business, but neither reading as being the WP:RS needed to establish encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 09:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.