Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peroor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination

Peroor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable secondary sources added and Seems trivial. →SeniorStar (talk) 13:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is a village (third tire of revenue division in the state) of Kottayam District. Article have serious problems with the way it is written and there aren't any sources. Still it would be harsh to delete it without giving a chance to improve the article by finding sources. A maintenance tag for multiple issues would be my choice. It passes WP:GNG...Rameshnta909 (talk) 14:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GEOLAND, confirmed here. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as a legally recognized municipality, the subject plainly passes WP:GEOLAND standards. I've added the census ref (thanks 86.17.222.157) and tagged for cleanup. Antepenultimate (talk) 00:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the others. It is a recognized population center. Per WP:GEOLAND and WP:5PILLARS. Villages aren't trivial. --Oakshade (talk) 04:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per others and it also passes WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. --Bagas Chrisara (talk) 13:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination →SeniorStar (talk) 13:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.