Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perpetual Learning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perpetual Learning

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software lab/company with no coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No third-party indication of corporate notability. Promotional article about non-notable company. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Concur with nom and Robert McClenon. Fails WP:NCORP. Waggie (talk) 01:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. The name makes it very hard to find sources for it, but when searching for perpetualny.com, I didn't see relevant sources. --Hirsutism (talk) 20:47, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.