Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persistent object store

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:42, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent object store (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant content fork Screenmutt (talk) 17:43, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This page contains significant overlap with Object storage which contains better and more detailed information. Were this page to be expanded, then additional pages would need to be written for each type of object store (e.g. persistent, ephemeral, in-memory, etc.). These discussions are better left in Object storage Screenmutt (talk)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:57, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.