Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personals: College Girls Seeking...

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personals: College Girls Seeking...

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010, lets make a decision either way. Unreferenced, I don't believe it has lasting notability Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:NF. The article does not show or demonstrate any nobility. It also contains a source that directly conflicts with WP:NF ("Examples of coverage insufficient to fully establish notability include newspaper listings of screening times and venues"). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 16:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: with respects to User:Oshwah, notability is not dependent upon an article saying 'I'm notable because..." or by sources being used or not IN an article... notability is dependent upon them being available. See WP:NRVE. I will do some work and report beck. . Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good call on that point, MichaelQSchmidt. Let me locate some sources and see if they are sufficient to meet WP:NF per WP:NRVE, which would cause my vote to change. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:39, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alt:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

French:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Per failing WP:NF. Expanding searches finds this soft core film exists, but lacks coverage in secondary sources. Being verifiable, it might be worth being listed in filmography's of its cast and production, but not as a separate article. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 16:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.