Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petcube

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Was speedily deleted by Casliber as G11 at 06:34, 10 September 2017 (UTC). (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Petcube

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be promotion. References are insufficient to establish notability. Rhadow (talk) 12:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as unambiguous avertising for a private company with no indications of notability or significance. Article exists solely to promote the business. Created by Special:Contributions/L7starlight currently indef blocked for promotionalism. I requested a speedy deletion under G11; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.