Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter C. Brinckerhoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 17:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peter C. Brinckerhoff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches found nothing to suggest sourcing improvement and better understanding of notability, with the best results here, here and here. The article has basically stayed the same since February 2009 with no uplifting, pivotal and convincing signs of improvement. SwisterTwister talk 03:57, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:37, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:37, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Although it isn't easy finding RS. His books are held by significant numbers of libraries (e.g. ~#750, ~#550), mostly academic. They are published by a well-known academic publisher (Wiley). I find his books used in university courses (e.g. [1], [2]). He has won an award for his books. (I fixed that link [3]) He teaches "master classes" ([4], [5], [6]). However, I don't find reviews in Booklist or Kirkus, which seems odd to me. I guess the non-profit world is a world apart. I'll add some of these links to the article. LaMona (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The book holdings are sufficient, and the awards supplement them. The article however, needs considerable work. DGG ( talk ) 18:22, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.