Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter De Keyzer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:42, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peter De Keyzer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NBIO; no substantial biographical details from independent reliable sources are available. Note that the article in its current state has whole sections sourced to blogs, and even subject's educational credentials are sourced to a speaker bio most likely supplied by the subject. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de} L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de} L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de} L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 22:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.