Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter O'Connell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peter O'Connell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced biography of a film technician, not properly referenced as having any strong claim to passing WP:CREATIVE. The only notability claim in evidence here is that he exists, which isn't enough in and of itself -- he would need to have WP:GNG-worthy coverage about his work, and/or major award wins or nominations, to be notable for this. Bearcat (talk) 21:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only found coverages of other people with the same name, having professions ranging from judge to researchers. Fails WP:GNG. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.