Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phijets group
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 03:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Phijets group
- Phijets group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete: Fails WP:ORG, not notable. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Delete – Not notable, most of the sources are... well hardly that. Google search reveals little but social media and mention in some travel blogs. DiscantX 09:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Delete per nom and DiscantX. It may be of some bearing that this article is basically a replacement for Zenith Air, deleted a week ago after I PRODded it. YSSYguy (talk) 05:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete doesnt appear to meet notability requirements. MilborneOne (talk) 18:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete there does not appear to be any secondary or tertiary reliable sources that explore the subject in an in-depth or in a manor which one would describe as significant coverage. Therefore the subject fails WP:GNG, and does not meet notability requirements set forth in that or WP:ORG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:51, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - doesn't satisfy WP:NORG. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 01:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.