Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Photomatix Pro (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photomatix Pro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nearly 10 years after the last AfD, this is still in a bad shape. I see one review of this software: [1] but I don't think a single review is sufficient for estabilishing notability. Can anyone find anything more? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. The coverage raised in the past afd was, apart from the 1 review mentioned above, all incidental mentions. One review is on its own insufficient to establish notability, and a search turned up no additional significant coverage of this product.Dialectric (talk) 10:44, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.