Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phulpoto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Phulpoto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Un-sourced for over 8 years. Full of self promotion. I tried to find a version to revert back to that had some redeeming features, but I went back at least 5 years and couldnt find any. (I have to say, it's crap!) "Phulpoto is Sindhi Samma sub-tribe" I can't see any claim of notability there 220 of ^Borg 11:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A tribe article would be good but the article's current state is far from good. A Books search found nothing that seems relevant or significant. A search through News found nothing so I have to think foreign sources (if they exist) are the only hope. A look through the page's history shows it has never even come close to getting better. SwisterTwister talk 18:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.