Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physics Plot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:56, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Physics Plot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software product tagged since June 2008. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:18, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Interesting software, but only finding one reliable source that provides a single short paragraph about it ([1]); fails WP:N. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as I still have found nothing else better for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant coverage in independent reliable sources - no indication of notability. Steve Quinn (talk) 03:17, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find any coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Enterprisey (talk!) _{(formerly APerson)} 05:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.