Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pibby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be draftified on request at WP:REFUND. Sandstein 08:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pibby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks any in depth coverage, just a few articles, mostly in unreliable sources, repeating press materials about the show being in development, or being a Halloween short. Does not appear notable. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge might be a better fit, as there certainly is relevancy and notability regarding the show, only not enough to justify its very own article; perhaps with upcoming Cartoon Network shows or upcoming Adult Swim shows, as CN's copyright filing seems to indicate intent to act on the IP at some point in the future.

~~~~ W0nderhat (talk) 07:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There isn’t even anything announced about the series, the series hasn’t even been greenlit, nothing more than just a cut sneak peek. There’s not enough information about it than just a standalone article.

Userfy/Draftify I agree that while there is relevancy and notability, the fact that it hasn't been greenlit makes it unsuitable for inclusion in either of the article sections mentioned by W0nderhat, and the lack of greenlighting means that there is little to discuss regarding this show. However, this is a good start to the article should it be greenlit in the future, so I think it's worth keeping around in some form for if/when the show becomes greenlit. Edderiofer (talk) 08:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify Interesting premise, but this show is not notable at this moment. If they greenlit it, it can has its own article on WP. Until then, it can move to a draft page. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.