Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierangelo Metrangolo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The comments regarding WP:PROF are decisive. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pierangelo Metrangolo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Does not meet WP:GNG - coverage found during searches is a mix of passing mentions and his own website & his own Institutions website. Article attempts to inherit notability from the events he has been involved in & the people he has worked with, but that's not enough to pass the GNG threshold. Opj75 (talk) 22:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 March 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:29, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:29, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. His Google Scholar profile shows a citation record that seems like an easy pass of WP:PROF#C1. EricEnfermero (Talk) 07:29, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Besides the clear pass of WP:PROF#C1 outlined above, his FRSC gives him a pass of #C3. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.