Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piero Atchugarry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Piero Atchugarry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puff piece article. No indication of being notable. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV scope_creep^Talk 08:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - gallery may be notable, but it is not established for the individual. 1292simon (talk) 08:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:SIGCOV and WP:NOTINHERITED. The gallery, and his father might be notable, but not its owner. Bearian (talk) 16:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.