Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinnacle Blooms Network
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Pinnacle Blooms Network
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pinnacle Blooms Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is supported only by press releases. The claims the article makes - 7,000+ centres across the globe - are impressive, but I can't find any independent, reliable sources confirming any of that, all of the coverage I can find looks like republished press releases. The author has not declared any affiliation to this organisation, but describes himself as a 'digital marketer' on his userpage, so it may be an example of WP:UPE. I can't find any sourcing of the quality called for by WP:NCORP. Girth Summit (blether) 15:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Girth Summit (blether) 15:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Girth Summit (blether) 15:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a well disguised advert. Many of the references are regurgitated press releases and PR material. WP:BOMBARD applies. That it is a good cause is interesting, but irrelevant. Fails WP:NCORP. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- To be clear - I believe that all of the references are regurgitated press releases and PR material! I looked, but I wasn't able to find anything that looked like organic coverage. Girth Summit (blether) 22:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- I was only able to speak about the selection I checked. Checking all must have been a marathon task. I commend you for it. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 11:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- To be clear - I believe that all of the references are regurgitated press releases and PR material! I looked, but I wasn't able to find anything that looked like organic coverage. Girth Summit (blether) 22:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Spam and promotional. RationalPuff (talk) 11:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.